I would also look into Tony Podesta, his art collection, Anthony Weiner and his laptop, Frazzledrip, and a certain child that went missing when Tony and John were over in Europe.
Correct. Tony Podesta has a very disturbing "art" collection and there is the case of many of the NYPD investigators looking into the "insurance" file on Weiner's laptop conveniently suiciding themselves over the debatable Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton snuff video Frazzledrip. I have a trusted friend who said he found it in the dark web a while back. I haven't bothered. Anyhow, there is a lot of circustantial weirdness around it all. Oh, and Huma is now in a relationship with Alex Soros!
Snopes is such a joke. They were fun when they were investigating urban myths (with a cringy political subsection), but when they became establishment "fact-checkers" they completely fell apart.
I have a quotidian explanation for the 'map' comment on the 'handkerchief': Tomato stains.
Now, this really doesn't explain why one would use a *handkerchief* instead of a napkin, but if someone did do so, and wanted to make light of the tomato stains, they *might* call it a 'map'.
Pedophilia is a sickness. And it's contagious. You get it from associating with pedophiles.
Also, everyone needs to consider that *any* kind of deviant activity that occurs on as sustained a level as sexual deviancy against children *requires* law enforcement collaboration.
This was true in the days with homosexuality was a crime and it's true now with the crime of sexual deviancy against children.
Here he is arguing against Candace Owens sensationalist -- and misleading -- assertion. She maintains:
“'what we have right now is a pedophile ring that has assumed a ton of power in the world by pretending that any person who notices is antisemitic. My theory is that these people are not Jewish; they publicly present themselves as Jewish, but in reality, they worship and follow an entirely different faith, and it’s satanic. … These are demonic, monstrous people who are using Judaism to hide their actions.'
My theory is the opposite: Jewish supremacists are using Satanism “to hide their actions.” The transgenerational sect of Satan-worshippers operating in total impunity at the highest level of Hollywood, Wall Street, and Washington—raping, torturing, sacrificing and drinking the blood of children in black masses—is a fantasy to deflect attention from the cult that really controls Hollywood, Wall Street and Washington."
It's not a bad theory, it does fit, but I think a simpler explanation is that they're Satanist because they really hate Christian society and either want to piss off Christians because they think it's funny or hate it so much they want to adopt it's polar opposite.
I'm not a Christian btw, but jews have a massive inferiority complex when it comes to their sister religion. Even atheist jews.
Huh, I've made that point many times before, it's funny having it thrown back at me. Good point.
Either way they life in a predominantly white and christian society and they feel the need to subvert it. Making their cult the opposite of what normal white people believe is a form of petty revenge.
That explanation still relies on the assumption that someone is using coded language, it just assumes they're using coded language to talk about something innocent.
We don't need an explanation for why someone might use coded language to discuss criminal activity, we do need an explanation for why they might do it to discuss innocent behaviour. That is not a normal thing people do.
Occam's razor says they were not talking about tomato stains on a napkin.
My explanation would be that - in this specific case - what you're calling 'coded language' I see simply 'poetic language'. Which is a kind of 'code', I suppose, but not intrinsically suspicious.
'Occam's Razor' doesn't apply. There's no 'all things being equal' in this situation. There's just trivial evidence and prejudice.
I despise these people and their behavior is suspicious.
But 'paedophile network' is like the number '23'.
Once you start thinking about it, you start seeing it everywhere.
'Paedophile networks' in 'populist' circles serve the same purpose as 'satanic cult activity' did in the 1990s.
These memes are injected into populist circles to distract ordinary folks from pursuing more fruitful activities and can be easily used to 'paint' populists as deranged.
I have no doubt that there is paedophiles in the world. Everyone who has ever thrown a teenage boy out because they misbehaved or stopped caring what their sons or daughters were doing when they're working or playing have fed this monster.
'Paedophilia' is a terrible crime, but the narrative around 'paedophile' networks is moronic. If focuses on the consumer (perverts) and ignores the suppliers (ordinary families that stop caring about their boys).
That's still coded language. It's not suspicious in an artistic work, but it would be very unusual in a professional email from realtor to a client.
Plus, even if we accept that she decided to write an email about a napkin with tomato stains on it and decided to write it as poetry... we still have to account for why she'd do any of that at all. It's a bizarre theory that creates more questions than answers, whereas the theory that they're discussing criminal activity and using coded language to avoid prosecution is simple and in line with normal human behaviour seen elsewhere.
As for your argument that there can't be elite pedophile rings because ordinary pedophiles exist... lol. Lmao even.
It's not a theory. It's an alternative interpretation of the available facts *specific* to one set of facts.
In an actual courtroom, a sensible prosecutor would not want to include as 'evidence' of a crime any 'evidence' on which *even a shadow of a doubt* might be cast.
Yes you did. You argued that believing in pedo cults is moronic because regular small-time pedos exist, and somehow families are to blame because they're not helicopter parents. It's either laughable or revolting, take your pick.
This isn't a courtroom. Your theory relies on some pretty weird and unexplained behaviour. Mine relies on normal patterns of criminal behaviour seen elsewhere.
Until you can explain that gap in your theory it remains less likely than mine.
Where - exactly - did I say that paedophile cults are impossible because 'small-time pedos exist'?
Your mind is built out of a set of worthless dichotomies, if something isn't X then it has to be anti-X. It never occurs to you that 'not X' might also be 'Y' or 'Z'.
So, if I point out that families that 'kick out' their sons and daughters during their teens are on the 'supply side' of paedophilia, than I think 'helicopter parenting' is required. If by 'helicopter parenting' you mean *not kicking teenagers onto the street* then, yes, I'm all for helicopter parenting.
But your response is typical of the 'conspiracy community' within MAGA and other populist forums: Where responsibility actually falls in such as way as to be able to *do* something about the terrible thing you're fascinated with, you avoid taking up that responsibility and, instead, deflect back to your useless speculation.
You're not serious about stopping paedophilia if you don't concentrate on the 'supply side' of paedophilia.
You're a 'paedophile network enjoyer'.
You're not really concerned about children trapped in those networks.
This is why Hollywood jews will promote 'Cry of Freedom' and other such propaganda that makes out like 'paedophiles' have to kidnap children to get access to them.
Great intro Karl, this is definitely a subject where one could take a deep dive. Liz Crokin has done a ton of investigative work on this subject, a lot of which can be found right here on Substack (https://open.substack.com/pub/lizcrokin?r=o9q29&utm_medium=ios).
She’s also active on X and has some good posts on Telegram. There is so much to this story, research it a bit and if you were not convinced the media is your mortal enemy before you will be after. The media covering for this kind of stuff is beyond sickening. In a just world they’d all be put in front of a firing squad.
Sadly I suspect Crokin is limited hangout. I was told this specifically in a message on X from Emma Katherine / The Emmapreneur / Imagination Podcast who claims to have recorded the highest volume of SRA victim interview. She is amazing.
I do trust she may be right. It really is almost everyone at this point even in the 'alt media' area. I don't even have to list them, I think it's nearly everyone, even James Corbett over in Japan. I hope not Whitney Webb but she skirts the JQ as she has to really as a journalist. What an age of deception to be in, I truly had no idea until recently how widespread it was and how little actual reality gets through the cracks - thanks to X strangely and finding tons of researchers on there within the noise - until I was suspended from on January 23 of this year - Holocaust memorial day funnily enough - the same day I replied to the IDF tweet 'Never again' that 'never again is every single day in Palestine'.
There was also that weird email about Obama flying in $65,000 worth of hotdogs to the White House at midnight, or something of the like, and there was also a Podesta related email about kids being brought in to play with adults in a hot tub. Correct me if I am wrong. .
I saw a film clip where a young child in a shower was being harassed and threatened by an unseen man the bathroom was dark. He was screaming at the kid, "You think you're hot shit don't ya!" Over and over to the screaming terrified child. The voice sounded like John Podestas. Do I knowvits him no but it did sound like him.
Agreed, this is too important to skirt over especially since it went completely viral yet of course Wikipedia (which is basically edited by armies of Israelis) says it's a CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRy which seems to work on the normies for some reason despite anyone since the 90s being able to realise that the term itself is a CIA psyop.
At the same time it's one of those things which is so conspicuous yet ambiguous it brings fatigue / cognitive dissonance. Maybe that's the idea.
But from the start just intuitively I've felt there's something really nasty afoot here. Who knows how many are involved, which is actually nonsense blown out of proportion (as claimed for the whole of it) and which is genuinely very well known people getting away with it in plain sight. Of course it happens on a smaller scale as well. If only there were a way to put payed to it all once and for all.
1. You may want to look at the "spirit cooking" thing again. It follows almost all of the same patterns as the pizzagate scandal, where a group of connected political elites were caught sharing coded messages, one interpretation of which seemed to be backed up by other statements and affinities they held offline. In the case of spirit cooking, the artist Marina Abramovitch (jewish) has known admiration for Aleister Crowley, one of whose ritual practices was known as "spirit cooking." Given that her associate Podesta was referring to such a thing in emails suggests he was involved. The media "debunked" the theory by suggesting he was just talking about cooking on a spirit stove, which seems unlikely given that he's not exactly an avid hiker.
2. Have a look at Podesta's art collection (might as well look up Epstein's while you're at it). There's no way he's innocent in all of this.
My mum was listening to the BBC a few weeks ago and they were interviewing Abramovich. With what I've seen of her 'work' I was surprised, since it's there for anyone to image search on the internet. Are the BBC just brazen? Is she untouchable? I can't imagine the BBC interviewing her a couple of decades ago, is it the progress of modernism has degraded art and culture to the degree where people simply don't notice when a genuine Jewish occultist and ritual satanist is on a mainstream national and international media network?
As for my mum I didn't have the heart to tell her, even though she knows about a ton of the dodgy shit going on she kind of dismisses most of it as being unimportant because 'good energy always wins' without us having to do anything about it.
I certainly hope that's the case because there are some conspicuously evil actors in the world in plain sight and very few people can apparently see it but for me my blood runs cold and I feel rageful to see these demons not only moving around amongst us but in very public influential and powerful positions.
The BBC is run by all the same people, and has been for a long time, possibly since the beginning. The only reason they were more conservative in the past is because there was limits to what they could get away with.
Also because they find it fun. This isn't something they held their nose while they did it in order to score a big job. It was probably the reason they wanted the job.
I would also look into Tony Podesta, his art collection, Anthony Weiner and his laptop, Frazzledrip, and a certain child that went missing when Tony and John were over in Europe.
Correct. Tony Podesta has a very disturbing "art" collection and there is the case of many of the NYPD investigators looking into the "insurance" file on Weiner's laptop conveniently suiciding themselves over the debatable Huma Abedin/Hillary Clinton snuff video Frazzledrip. I have a trusted friend who said he found it in the dark web a while back. I haven't bothered. Anyhow, there is a lot of circustantial weirdness around it all. Oh, and Huma is now in a relationship with Alex Soros!
The police sketches looked exactly like the two but no worries, snopes did a world class debunk.
"The "efits" circulated by police depicted one man, not two, and the images were of a person of interest or witness, not a kidnapping suspect."
See, all good.
Snopes is such a joke. They were fun when they were investigating urban myths (with a cringy political subsection), but when they became establishment "fact-checkers" they completely fell apart.
I have a quotidian explanation for the 'map' comment on the 'handkerchief': Tomato stains.
Now, this really doesn't explain why one would use a *handkerchief* instead of a napkin, but if someone did do so, and wanted to make light of the tomato stains, they *might* call it a 'map'.
Pedophilia is a sickness. And it's contagious. You get it from associating with pedophiles.
Also, everyone needs to consider that *any* kind of deviant activity that occurs on as sustained a level as sexual deviancy against children *requires* law enforcement collaboration.
This was true in the days with homosexuality was a crime and it's true now with the crime of sexual deviancy against children.
Laurent Guyénot wrote about this.
Here he is arguing against Candace Owens sensationalist -- and misleading -- assertion. She maintains:
“'what we have right now is a pedophile ring that has assumed a ton of power in the world by pretending that any person who notices is antisemitic. My theory is that these people are not Jewish; they publicly present themselves as Jewish, but in reality, they worship and follow an entirely different faith, and it’s satanic. … These are demonic, monstrous people who are using Judaism to hide their actions.'
My theory is the opposite: Jewish supremacists are using Satanism “to hide their actions.” The transgenerational sect of Satan-worshippers operating in total impunity at the highest level of Hollywood, Wall Street, and Washington—raping, torturing, sacrificing and drinking the blood of children in black masses—is a fantasy to deflect attention from the cult that really controls Hollywood, Wall Street and Washington."
https://www.unz.com/article/dark-pill-how-satan-worshipping-pedophiles-have-taken-over-conspiracyland/
It's not a bad theory, it does fit, but I think a simpler explanation is that they're Satanist because they really hate Christian society and either want to piss off Christians because they think it's funny or hate it so much they want to adopt it's polar opposite.
I'm not a Christian btw, but jews have a massive inferiority complex when it comes to their sister religion. Even atheist jews.
It's not Christianity Jews hate, it's White people. Jews couldn't care less about Christianity or Christians in Africa.
Huh, I've made that point many times before, it's funny having it thrown back at me. Good point.
Either way they life in a predominantly white and christian society and they feel the need to subvert it. Making their cult the opposite of what normal white people believe is a form of petty revenge.
That explanation still relies on the assumption that someone is using coded language, it just assumes they're using coded language to talk about something innocent.
We don't need an explanation for why someone might use coded language to discuss criminal activity, we do need an explanation for why they might do it to discuss innocent behaviour. That is not a normal thing people do.
Occam's razor says they were not talking about tomato stains on a napkin.
My explanation would be that - in this specific case - what you're calling 'coded language' I see simply 'poetic language'. Which is a kind of 'code', I suppose, but not intrinsically suspicious.
'Occam's Razor' doesn't apply. There's no 'all things being equal' in this situation. There's just trivial evidence and prejudice.
I despise these people and their behavior is suspicious.
But 'paedophile network' is like the number '23'.
Once you start thinking about it, you start seeing it everywhere.
'Paedophile networks' in 'populist' circles serve the same purpose as 'satanic cult activity' did in the 1990s.
These memes are injected into populist circles to distract ordinary folks from pursuing more fruitful activities and can be easily used to 'paint' populists as deranged.
I have no doubt that there is paedophiles in the world. Everyone who has ever thrown a teenage boy out because they misbehaved or stopped caring what their sons or daughters were doing when they're working or playing have fed this monster.
'Paedophilia' is a terrible crime, but the narrative around 'paedophile' networks is moronic. If focuses on the consumer (perverts) and ignores the suppliers (ordinary families that stop caring about their boys).
That's still coded language. It's not suspicious in an artistic work, but it would be very unusual in a professional email from realtor to a client.
Plus, even if we accept that she decided to write an email about a napkin with tomato stains on it and decided to write it as poetry... we still have to account for why she'd do any of that at all. It's a bizarre theory that creates more questions than answers, whereas the theory that they're discussing criminal activity and using coded language to avoid prosecution is simple and in line with normal human behaviour seen elsewhere.
As for your argument that there can't be elite pedophile rings because ordinary pedophiles exist... lol. Lmao even.
You're 'lol'-ing an argument I didn't make.
It's not a theory. It's an alternative interpretation of the available facts *specific* to one set of facts.
In an actual courtroom, a sensible prosecutor would not want to include as 'evidence' of a crime any 'evidence' on which *even a shadow of a doubt* might be cast.
Yes you did. You argued that believing in pedo cults is moronic because regular small-time pedos exist, and somehow families are to blame because they're not helicopter parents. It's either laughable or revolting, take your pick.
This isn't a courtroom. Your theory relies on some pretty weird and unexplained behaviour. Mine relies on normal patterns of criminal behaviour seen elsewhere.
Until you can explain that gap in your theory it remains less likely than mine.
Where - exactly - did I say that paedophile cults are impossible because 'small-time pedos exist'?
Your mind is built out of a set of worthless dichotomies, if something isn't X then it has to be anti-X. It never occurs to you that 'not X' might also be 'Y' or 'Z'.
So, if I point out that families that 'kick out' their sons and daughters during their teens are on the 'supply side' of paedophilia, than I think 'helicopter parenting' is required. If by 'helicopter parenting' you mean *not kicking teenagers onto the street* then, yes, I'm all for helicopter parenting.
But your response is typical of the 'conspiracy community' within MAGA and other populist forums: Where responsibility actually falls in such as way as to be able to *do* something about the terrible thing you're fascinated with, you avoid taking up that responsibility and, instead, deflect back to your useless speculation.
You're not serious about stopping paedophilia if you don't concentrate on the 'supply side' of paedophilia.
You're a 'paedophile network enjoyer'.
You're not really concerned about children trapped in those networks.
This is why Hollywood jews will promote 'Cry of Freedom' and other such propaganda that makes out like 'paedophiles' have to kidnap children to get access to them.
They don't.
Their families push them out on the street.
Great intro Karl, this is definitely a subject where one could take a deep dive. Liz Crokin has done a ton of investigative work on this subject, a lot of which can be found right here on Substack (https://open.substack.com/pub/lizcrokin?r=o9q29&utm_medium=ios).
She’s also active on X and has some good posts on Telegram. There is so much to this story, research it a bit and if you were not convinced the media is your mortal enemy before you will be after. The media covering for this kind of stuff is beyond sickening. In a just world they’d all be put in front of a firing squad.
Sadly I suspect Crokin is limited hangout. I was told this specifically in a message on X from Emma Katherine / The Emmapreneur / Imagination Podcast who claims to have recorded the highest volume of SRA victim interview. She is amazing.
I do trust she may be right. It really is almost everyone at this point even in the 'alt media' area. I don't even have to list them, I think it's nearly everyone, even James Corbett over in Japan. I hope not Whitney Webb but she skirts the JQ as she has to really as a journalist. What an age of deception to be in, I truly had no idea until recently how widespread it was and how little actual reality gets through the cracks - thanks to X strangely and finding tons of researchers on there within the noise - until I was suspended from on January 23 of this year - Holocaust memorial day funnily enough - the same day I replied to the IDF tweet 'Never again' that 'never again is every single day in Palestine'.
Thanks for the careful investigative work, especially the links.
There was also that weird email about Obama flying in $65,000 worth of hotdogs to the White House at midnight, or something of the like, and there was also a Podesta related email about kids being brought in to play with adults in a hot tub. Correct me if I am wrong. .
I saw a film clip where a young child in a shower was being harassed and threatened by an unseen man the bathroom was dark. He was screaming at the kid, "You think you're hot shit don't ya!" Over and over to the screaming terrified child. The voice sounded like John Podestas. Do I knowvits him no but it did sound like him.
>gay man
>owns family restaurant
Guilty.
I think you should keep digging and return to this. There's definitely more that went on, but it's been a while since I cared about the event
Agreed, this is too important to skirt over especially since it went completely viral yet of course Wikipedia (which is basically edited by armies of Israelis) says it's a CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRy which seems to work on the normies for some reason despite anyone since the 90s being able to realise that the term itself is a CIA psyop.
At the same time it's one of those things which is so conspicuous yet ambiguous it brings fatigue / cognitive dissonance. Maybe that's the idea.
But from the start just intuitively I've felt there's something really nasty afoot here. Who knows how many are involved, which is actually nonsense blown out of proportion (as claimed for the whole of it) and which is genuinely very well known people getting away with it in plain sight. Of course it happens on a smaller scale as well. If only there were a way to put payed to it all once and for all.
They Abuse, RAPE Children & Babies, TORTURE & SACRIFICE them, Drink their Blood (Adrenochrome) & Eat their Flesh (Politicians, Royals, Ultrarich, Elites, Celebrities) https://mile7bar.substack.com/p/they-abuse-and-rape-children-but
They learned it from Jews. If not included in the above article, then here:
Blood Libel/ Ritual murder Legend, blood accusation of the JEWS ... that they abduct children, eat them & drink their blood (Adrenochrome)? It's NOT a legend at all https://mile7bar.substack.com/p/blood-libel-or-ritual-murder-libel
Interesting article. Just two suggestions:
1. You may want to look at the "spirit cooking" thing again. It follows almost all of the same patterns as the pizzagate scandal, where a group of connected political elites were caught sharing coded messages, one interpretation of which seemed to be backed up by other statements and affinities they held offline. In the case of spirit cooking, the artist Marina Abramovitch (jewish) has known admiration for Aleister Crowley, one of whose ritual practices was known as "spirit cooking." Given that her associate Podesta was referring to such a thing in emails suggests he was involved. The media "debunked" the theory by suggesting he was just talking about cooking on a spirit stove, which seems unlikely given that he's not exactly an avid hiker.
2. Have a look at Podesta's art collection (might as well look up Epstein's while you're at it). There's no way he's innocent in all of this.
My mum was listening to the BBC a few weeks ago and they were interviewing Abramovich. With what I've seen of her 'work' I was surprised, since it's there for anyone to image search on the internet. Are the BBC just brazen? Is she untouchable? I can't imagine the BBC interviewing her a couple of decades ago, is it the progress of modernism has degraded art and culture to the degree where people simply don't notice when a genuine Jewish occultist and ritual satanist is on a mainstream national and international media network?
As for my mum I didn't have the heart to tell her, even though she knows about a ton of the dodgy shit going on she kind of dismisses most of it as being unimportant because 'good energy always wins' without us having to do anything about it.
I certainly hope that's the case because there are some conspicuously evil actors in the world in plain sight and very few people can apparently see it but for me my blood runs cold and I feel rageful to see these demons not only moving around amongst us but in very public influential and powerful positions.
The BBC is run by all the same people, and has been for a long time, possibly since the beginning. The only reason they were more conservative in the past is because there was limits to what they could get away with.
Also because they find it fun. This isn't something they held their nose while they did it in order to score a big job. It was probably the reason they wanted the job.