In addition to the myth that the jew John von Neumann invented modern computer architecture and the ‘von Neumann machine’; (1) he is also widely credited with having invented game theory by prominent jews such as former British Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks.
Claiming the achievement of others to appear smarter seems to be a way of explaining why everyone hates them. It's jealousy you see, because we are so smart.
Hello, I was wondering if you have written or anything to say about Georg Ritter von Schoenerer? I got into a debate online the other day with someone who aggressively claimed that Nazism was a big psyop by Zionism to get the Jews to Israel, and he was bringing up Schoenerer claiming he was a Rothschild agent and taught Hitler everything he knew or something. He also claimed a lot of other stuff about Hitler's funding sources and said Turners book was wrong. Honestly from what I could see that was false I found his argumentation suspicious but I simply didn't know enough about the subject to create a structured argument beyond referencing what you and some other people in the dissident sphere have spoken about regarding the NS movement
Here are some of his arguments quoted straight from him
>Hitler was recruited as a penniless soldier by the judeo-masonic Thule Society in 1919
>Its founder was the wealthy cryptojew and mizraite freemason Von Sebottendorf, who also sold poor Hitler his newspaper in 1920
>Very prominent early NSDAP members were Thulists, like Hess and Rosenberg
>The DAP was the Thule Society's political vehicle. Hitler was first sent to a meeting by his commanding officer in the Reichswehr, Captain Karl Mayr - also a Thulist. Hitler was obviously recruited by Thule to lead the DAP
Von Arco auf Valley was obviously another jewish agent provocateur with Thulist links, but he didn't have anything to do with the Geiselmord of April 30, 1919
>As to Turner, like almost all mainstream accounts of Hitler's rise, it makes very little sense
His main argument is also mostly a strawman, as hardly anyone has argued with any force that 'German industrialists' were behind Hitler and the NSDAP. For the part that isn't a strawman, it's plain wrong, as Thyssen and Stinnes were extremely wealthy and influential industrialists who did indeed fund and support the NSDAP, as did e.g. (Rothschild agent) Deterding and Shell, and of course Ig Farben did too, but Turner notes they supported others too and thinks that's some kind of refutation
>There was NOTHING natural or organic about the kind of 'antisemitism' and coarse nordicism pushed by proto-nazis in the late 19th and early 20th century. That's why so many of Hitler's 'predecessors' - Wilhelm Marr, Georg von Schoenerer, Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels - were jewish or jewish agents
>Wall Street provided plenty of funds and support to Nazi Germany, not least via jewish NY Fed chairman Paul Warburg who also happened to be on the board of directors of American IG, IG Farben's American subsidiary
>At the very least, they were controlled (infiltrated and captured) by their enemies. Who were controlled by jews
In some cases, such as the Luftwaffe, they were controlled directly by jews (Milch and Wilberg)
>Dr Morell had exclusive access to Hitler all through the war, and he pumped him full of all sorts of narco-hypnotics and stimulants on a daily basis. Dr Morell's control went well beyond that, to the point this snake oil salesman was allowed to supply THE ENTIRE WEHRMACHT with his famously ineffective lice powder causing untold thousands of typhoid deaths in the ranks, and he also deliberately stalled developemnt of pennici,lin again causing untold thousands of preventable deaths [he's implying Morell is a Jewish agent here]
>You misunderstand. Yes, antisemitism was mainstream throughout Europe before agent Hitler and his merry band of cryptokikes ruined it all, but the famous public figures (jews) I mentioned exploited it in Central Europe to create a push factor for Israel (and in fact, the US) and prepare Germany for the Nazi psyop - at least, that's my working hypothesis going from the facts. If you have a better explanation why e.g. a Rothschild agent like Schoenerer would become the 'godfather of antisemitism' and 'proto-hitler' in pre-war Austria, I'd like to hear it
>He [Sutton] does point out Thyssen's link to Wall Street e.g. via his Dutch front bank to Harriman cs.
>> you've now conceded ground that Thyssen and Hanfstagl are unreliable
>No, I've only denied your claim, that Sutton relies on them when he argues Wall Street funded the NSDAP
>>pivoted to defending Sidney Warburg as a credible source
>No, I've pointed out Sutton doesn't consider it credible (calling it a 'myth') and doesn't rely on it either, as you claimed [he refuses to elaborate]
He’s quite a well known figure and Turner’s book is right: there is no actual counter to Turner in part because Turner is the expert on this and his findings have been confirmed by other specialists (like Cris Whetton) and generalists (like Richard Evans).
He needs to provide actual evidence - Sutton has been debunked in detail by Kerry Bolton for example not just call names. Force him to bring his sources and you’ll see he has nothing.
It blows my mind how computer science courses at Uni still celebrate Von Neumann as a pillar of the discipline even today. I had no idea about any of this backstory regarding him
White men invented the modern world.
Claiming the achievement of others to appear smarter seems to be a way of explaining why everyone hates them. It's jealousy you see, because we are so smart.
Claiming the achievement of others to appear smarter seems to be * one of the many ways…
True parasites.
Hello, I was wondering if you have written or anything to say about Georg Ritter von Schoenerer? I got into a debate online the other day with someone who aggressively claimed that Nazism was a big psyop by Zionism to get the Jews to Israel, and he was bringing up Schoenerer claiming he was a Rothschild agent and taught Hitler everything he knew or something. He also claimed a lot of other stuff about Hitler's funding sources and said Turners book was wrong. Honestly from what I could see that was false I found his argumentation suspicious but I simply didn't know enough about the subject to create a structured argument beyond referencing what you and some other people in the dissident sphere have spoken about regarding the NS movement
Here are some of his arguments quoted straight from him
>Hitler was recruited as a penniless soldier by the judeo-masonic Thule Society in 1919
>Its founder was the wealthy cryptojew and mizraite freemason Von Sebottendorf, who also sold poor Hitler his newspaper in 1920
>Very prominent early NSDAP members were Thulists, like Hess and Rosenberg
>The DAP was the Thule Society's political vehicle. Hitler was first sent to a meeting by his commanding officer in the Reichswehr, Captain Karl Mayr - also a Thulist. Hitler was obviously recruited by Thule to lead the DAP
Von Arco auf Valley was obviously another jewish agent provocateur with Thulist links, but he didn't have anything to do with the Geiselmord of April 30, 1919
>As to Turner, like almost all mainstream accounts of Hitler's rise, it makes very little sense
His main argument is also mostly a strawman, as hardly anyone has argued with any force that 'German industrialists' were behind Hitler and the NSDAP. For the part that isn't a strawman, it's plain wrong, as Thyssen and Stinnes were extremely wealthy and influential industrialists who did indeed fund and support the NSDAP, as did e.g. (Rothschild agent) Deterding and Shell, and of course Ig Farben did too, but Turner notes they supported others too and thinks that's some kind of refutation
>There was NOTHING natural or organic about the kind of 'antisemitism' and coarse nordicism pushed by proto-nazis in the late 19th and early 20th century. That's why so many of Hitler's 'predecessors' - Wilhelm Marr, Georg von Schoenerer, Jorg Lanz von Liebenfels - were jewish or jewish agents
>Wall Street provided plenty of funds and support to Nazi Germany, not least via jewish NY Fed chairman Paul Warburg who also happened to be on the board of directors of American IG, IG Farben's American subsidiary
>At the very least, they were controlled (infiltrated and captured) by their enemies. Who were controlled by jews
In some cases, such as the Luftwaffe, they were controlled directly by jews (Milch and Wilberg)
>Dr Morell had exclusive access to Hitler all through the war, and he pumped him full of all sorts of narco-hypnotics and stimulants on a daily basis. Dr Morell's control went well beyond that, to the point this snake oil salesman was allowed to supply THE ENTIRE WEHRMACHT with his famously ineffective lice powder causing untold thousands of typhoid deaths in the ranks, and he also deliberately stalled developemnt of pennici,lin again causing untold thousands of preventable deaths [he's implying Morell is a Jewish agent here]
>You misunderstand. Yes, antisemitism was mainstream throughout Europe before agent Hitler and his merry band of cryptokikes ruined it all, but the famous public figures (jews) I mentioned exploited it in Central Europe to create a push factor for Israel (and in fact, the US) and prepare Germany for the Nazi psyop - at least, that's my working hypothesis going from the facts. If you have a better explanation why e.g. a Rothschild agent like Schoenerer would become the 'godfather of antisemitism' and 'proto-hitler' in pre-war Austria, I'd like to hear it
>He [Sutton] does point out Thyssen's link to Wall Street e.g. via his Dutch front bank to Harriman cs.
>> you've now conceded ground that Thyssen and Hanfstagl are unreliable
>No, I've only denied your claim, that Sutton relies on them when he argues Wall Street funded the NSDAP
>>pivoted to defending Sidney Warburg as a credible source
>No, I've pointed out Sutton doesn't consider it credible (calling it a 'myth') and doesn't rely on it either, as you claimed [he refuses to elaborate]
Sure I can.
He’s quite a well known figure and Turner’s book is right: there is no actual counter to Turner in part because Turner is the expert on this and his findings have been confirmed by other specialists (like Cris Whetton) and generalists (like Richard Evans).
He needs to provide actual evidence - Sutton has been debunked in detail by Kerry Bolton for example not just call names. Force him to bring his sources and you’ll see he has nothing.
It blows my mind how computer science courses at Uni still celebrate Von Neumann as a pillar of the discipline even today. I had no idea about any of this backstory regarding him