The Laughable Irrelevance of David Cole
David Cole is famous for one thing and one thing only: producing a documentary on Auschwitz doubting the orthodox version of the ‘Holocaust’ and being jewish while doing it.
Had he not been jewish then I rather doubt anyone would still remember his ‘work’ since many better and more up-to-date documentaries have since been produced – notably DenierBud’s ‘One Third of the Holocaust’ – only to in time fade into the background not because of their lack of quality but because of the relatively short shelf-life of all but a very few documentaries.
After being threatened by the Jewish Defence League – because as we all know jews aren’t violent international terrorists and that label only applies to Islamists and ‘right-wing extremists’ – then Cole went into hiding and started using the name ‘David Stein’ instead.
What did he do to make money you ask?
He produced pro-Holocaust documentaries since no one is a better proponent of ‘Holocaust’ orthodoxy than a ‘former Holocaust denier’ as Jean-Claude Pressac showed so well. This in large part because pro-Holocaust historians are often poorly acquainted with the ‘Holocaust’ beyond the largely set traditional narrative and simply crib references and quotes from each other to disguise their lack of traditional historical research in archives.
Besides orthodox ‘Holocaust’ ‘scholarship’ is the easiest thing in the world as you merely need to recycle a pre-determined conclusion (the ‘6 million’), deplore ‘anti-Semitism’ and/or ‘Holocaust Denial’ as ‘irrational’ then add a fresh new angle like blaming the German people writ large (Daniel Jonah Goldhagen), nationalism writ large (Enzo Traverso and Nigel Jones), the Bolshevik Revolution (Ernst Nolte), Roman Catholicism (John Cornwall) etc.
Easy as… well… a jewish woman.
Anyway, Cole enjoyed his time in Hollywood supporting the Republican party and fighting the ‘evil Democrats’ as he recounts in his book ‘Republican Party Animal’ and regals his reader with overblown stories that emphasize both his personal sexual attractiveness and political importance. Both of which are clearly lacking in reality, but Cole wants you to believe he was and is just sooo important.
This takes onto Cole post-exposure as… well… ‘Holocaust denier’ David Cole and the fact that very few places will publish him and how he somehow wrangled a regular spot at Takimag which coincided somewhat with the publication tanking into near political irrelevance due to a combination of bad management and boring writers (like Cole).
The only decent writer Takimag has left is Steve Sailer (who primarily writes for iSteve and VDARE) and even Sailer is increasingly a shadow of his former self as he has been repeatedly exposed as being resistant to the reality of data on so-called ‘jewish intelligence’.
Anyway, Cole continually tries to remain relevant and get a paycheck at Takimag with his frankly boring and predictable columns that claim much but contribute little. These usually revolve around lecturing actual right-wingers about how they should be pro-Israel (I wonder why you won’t just give Jonathan Greenblatt a blowjob and make Aliyah David?) and shrieking about how ‘Holocaust Denial is dead’. (1)
He's now come back with his latest pro-jewish boilerplate in a fresh article that attacks pretty much everyone he is jealous of by name.
Cole writes that:
‘Throughout the legalization debate, not enough people asked, “Putting decriminalization aside, is this shit as good for you as the propagandists say?”
A similar thing happened on the right when social media began cracking down on “conspiracy theories” following the 2016 election, and post-2020 when the Biden Administration created (with the assistance of the press) the “misinformation Stasi.” The wackiest wackbags on the net—Alex Jones, Andrew Anglin, Nick Fuentes—found themselves social-media banned, and rightists became like potheads. It wasn’t enough to argue for “choice;” one had to preach benefit.
“I’ll bet ‘they’re’ keeping this information from us because ‘they’ know that these truths are our key to freedom!”’ (2)
This is a typically bad rhetorical argument from Cole; it completely ignores the reason that Anglin and Fuentes in particular were actively banned from most social media platforms is because they were effective. Potheads aren’t banned from social media because they are potheads but rather when potheads are actually successfully spreading their views and that these views as such are a threat to the state.
That doesn’t mean those views are right – Alex Jones claiming that ‘Chinese Communists’ run Hollywood is laughable at best – but rather that they are just far better at it than… well… David Cole.
This success is something that Cole is clearly very jealous of and the real root of his angry article against people who are far more successful than he will ever be. We can see this showcased nicely by his raging against ‘Holocaust Deniers’, Jared Taylor (while passive-aggressively attacking him) and his fellow jew Ron Unz (presumably because of the success of the ‘Unz Review’):
‘That the “misinfo” censors drew no distinction between the factually provable (“black crime stats are high” —Jared Taylor) and the schizophrenically stupid (“Jews faked the Holocaust and drink adrenochrome” —Ron Unz) only served to link the commonsensical to the zero-sensical in the minds of rightists (I’m not saying this was calculated, but if leftists did execute an “op” to manipulate the right into bundling black crime and closed borders with Holocaust denial, turning rightists into dipshits who can’t embrace one without the other, it’s been the most effective op ever).’ (3)
Notice how Cole doesn’t make any actual arguments and instead just uses rhetorical claims and smears?
Well, that is par the course for jews especially angry failures with huge imploded egos like Cole.
I mean when in doubt call the successful people ‘dipshits’ and snidely imply they are a leftist ‘op’ to turn ‘rightists into dipshits’. After all it covers the fact that Cole is a lonely little jew who is despised by many of his own kin who he desperately wants to love him and pay him the big bucks for ‘promoting Israel’ to ‘Nazis’.
We can see this further when Cole continues to rage incoherently about how anyone on the right-wing is ‘detached from reality’ if they ‘doubt’ the ‘Holocaust’:
‘“Allowing” Unz, Jones, Anglin, Fuentes, isn’t enough. They must be embraced, as they are the path to victory!
Say rightists who haven’t won a single victory since adopting that view.
Jones, Unz, and the massive-following Holocaust denial MAGA-nuts like Stew Peters, Owen Benjamin, etc., are pollutants. That doesn’t mean they should be banned, but they’re a purely negative force. Their sole purpose is to detach rightists from reality, to submerge them in a sea of “everything’s a false flag” and “everything’s Jew trickery” and “reality itself cannot be believed.” This is, of course, a callback to my column two weeks ago in which I explained why Holocaust denial is growing so rapidly on the right. It’s a tool, employed expertly by Unz in particular, to make you say “now I don’t believe anything.”’ (4)
We on the right wing are all ‘failing’ according to Cole because we have been ‘deluded’ and are ‘polluting’ the purity of the Republican party’s position as Israel’s favourite power bottom in the United States.
The problem is that simply isn’t true because if the right wing wasn’t effective and winning hearts and minds across America via grassroots activism (as opposed to the top-down dictated ideology of jews like Cole) then jews like Cole wouldn’t be routinely freaking out about the increasing number of right wingers who aren’t interested in Israel First anymore.
Cole and those like him are deeply afraid that they’ve lost control of the right wing forever and that the right wing has gone so far off the reservation that they will both capture the hearts and minds of White America and put jews like Cole on the first flight to Tel Aviv to hang out with angry Arabs without American money and arms to routinely bail the Israeli economy and military out of their state of continual existential crisis.
This Cole seeks to do by drawing a false equivalence using the slippery slope fallacy:
‘If “they” could fake the Holocaust, then “they” could fake 9/11, J6, October 7th, and every mass shooting from Sandy Hook to the one that’ll likely happen between when I write this and when you read it.
I’m not arguing that any speech should be banned. I’m counseling you to avoid the trap of “if ‘they’ want it banned, it must be true.”’ (5)
Basically Cole is claiming (not arguing) that if you believe the ‘Holocaust was faked’ – this is incidentally a snide little lie as that has never been the revisionist position but rather it is that the ‘Holocaust’ is a historical claim with little to no actual evidence to support it - then you doubt the official narrative on 9/11, January 6th and (the Israeli narrative on) 7th October then you are some kind of moron.
To try and buttress this stupid claim Cole immediately throws in the idea that if you believe the ‘Holocaust’ is a historically ignorant claim then you must also believe that 9/11 was done with mini-nukes and/or that ‘crisis actors’ are routinely deployed to fake mass shootings as part of the war on guns in the United States.
This is a quintessential example of an argument in bad faith and a modified form of an argument from Hitler – in this case an argument from Alex Jones – which is as stupid as claiming Marxists must ipso facto deny the Holodomor if they are Marxists: the positions are not related and what Cole is desperately trying to do is to claim that ‘Holocaust is true because if you doubt it then you are like Alex Jones’.
Personally, I believe in the power of Socratic dialogue to force bad arguments out into the open and expose them for what they are. This is why I have long welcomed educated debate on the Holodomor not because I think the Holodomor didn’t happen – it clearly did – but rather because by pitting arguments and data against each other we force bad arguments out of the equation.
This is because unlike Cole I am not afraid to argue my point nor concede when I am wrong because I am an Aryan not a jew who is only brave when he has an army behind him.
Cole however continues with his bad faith attempt at concern trolling the right when he writes that:
‘Like I said, if leftists were running an op to manipulate the right into trading real-world politics for voter-alienating fantasy, they couldn’t be doing a better job than they are now. But it isn’t an op; it’s organic. On the left, you have a mix of people who possess a genuine concern for misinformation (yes, some folks sincerely believe that Holocaust denial shouldn’t be online. Their methods may be wrong, but they’re not “withholding the truth” from you) coupled with shameless partisan hacks who deceitfully mislabel as disinfo accurate stories like the Hunter laptop to steer political events. And on the right, there are the other shameless hacks—the “influencers” who deceitfully tether Holocaust denial to issues that matter, but also, there are sincere, ordinary rightists who are simply dissatisfied with reality (and I can’t see how any rightist could, today, be anything but dissatisfied with reality after so many defeats), so they cling to detachment as cope, Novocaine, like a pot user. No malice, just escapism.’ (6)
This comes back to my previous point that Cole explicitly denied that he was calling Anglin, Fuentes and Jones were leftist ‘op’ but was in reality trying to snidely imply this was the case and he showcases this perfectly by shrieking at full volume about how the right’s increasing anti-jewish beliefs are ‘voter-alienating fantasy’.
I mean how would Cole know since he hasn’t chatted with rustbelt or bible-belt voters lately to my knowledge nor has he chatted with White Americans in the South recently?
He’s just a rootless cosmopolitan shrieking from a gated community about how ‘he knows da twoof’ with one hand on his cock and the other grasping a framed photograph of Bibi Netanyahu.
The fact is that the right wing in the United States – and indeed globally – are increasingly anti-Israel and that the grassroots activist base of the Republican party itself are of this opinion and that this attitude is spreading fast.
Why else would Cole be this blatantly terrified that something was rising in the West that will make the Third Reich look positively kind?
But Cole won’t tell you that: instead, he’ll tell you why you should #believealljews, send your sons and daughters to die for Israel and be grateful to lick the boots of the jewish master race.
And he’ll do it while telling you how anything else is just ‘escapism’ and ‘detached from reality’ when the only one detached from reality here is Cole himself. He’s the one getting triggered by shoes, showers and soap where-as the actual right wing just laughs at such nonsense.
After his rhetorical death spiral went a little too far into the realm of Narnia; Cole pulls it back and starts telling us that only leftists (and apparently David Cole) know how to do activist politics.
He writes that:
‘My point is, leftists can show genuine gain from their bullshit. 2020 influenced by the laptop cover-up, blacks out of prison or not prosecuted at all, whites out of jobs or not getting hired, and a generation of children with scrambled brains who think biology is a “cis conspiracy.”’ (7)
The problem with this is against is that Cole doesn’t tell you who said ‘leftists’ are and instead leaves it vague and unsubstantiated.
Perhaps because said ‘leftists’ are disproportionately jewish David?
Nor does Cole explain why only ‘leftists’ can successfully do activism nor why ‘gender fluidity’ as a denial of biological reality is any less of a piece of escapism and ‘voter-alienating lunacy’ than anything Alex Jones has said/written about Sandy Hook, but then Alex Jones and leftists promoting ‘gender fluidity’ actually have an audience: don’t they?
Cole then moves onto lecturing the right wing by claiming:
‘Rightist celebs die on a hill of memes. Leftist celebs are far more likely to focus their influence on things like winning elections.’ (8)
Cole fundamentally forgets that it was – and is – right wing meme culture that is significantly responsible for Donald Trump’s victory in 2016 and also why the Democratic Party was forced to use vote-rigging and other dangerous and short-term political devices to attain victory in 2020 which in turn triggered January 6th.
What Cole wants is for the right wing to get back to losing most elections and when the Republican party does win for it go back to betraying its White American base in the interests of big money jewish donors.
I am afraid David that such is increasingly a thing of the past: we are young and ready to fight, while people like you are aging and try to pay people to fight your battles for you. That’s why you are so upset; we won’t fight your battles for you anymore.
Cole then promotes his ‘cure’ for the right:
‘Rightist reality detachment is a curse, as are the people who promote it. And if you help them, even if only by Twitter-following Holocaust deniers like Peters and Benjamin, you’re one of the baddies (“I just do it for the LULZ!” is no excuse – your “follow” increases their visibility).
Do one positive real-world thing today; unfollow a “now I don’t believe anything” rightist influencer, or remove that Unz bookmark.’ (9)
In essence, Cole wants you to unfollow right winters and instead – by implication – follow him.
This - ladies and gentlemen - is the rootless cosmopolitan at his most desperate.
He knows he and his kind are losing both the battles and the war, so he turns to rhetoric rather than debate to try and ‘win’ back White America for Israel and international jewry.
Tell him where he can shove his mezuzah.
References
(1) I’ve discussed this in the following articles: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-cole-jewish-con-man; https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-cole-lies-about-holocaust-denial; https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/david-coles-denial-of-holocaust-denial
(2) https://www.takimag.com/article/cartoon-gun-real-bullet/
(3) Ibid.
(4) Ibid.
(5) Ibid.
(6) Ibid.
(7) Ibid.
(8) Ibid.
(9) Ibid.