The ‘Holocaust’ as a historical narrative is a bit like a rotten apple; it can look absolutely fine superficially at the start of your investigation, but the more you cut into it the rottener it becomes.
A good example of this is the story of French ‘Holocaust Survivor’ Moshe Peer who claimed in ‘The Gazette’ of Montreal in 1993 that:
‘As an 11-year-old boy held captive at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II. Moshe Peer was sent to the gas chamber at least six times.
Each time he survived, watching with horror as many of the women and children gassed with him collapsed and died.
To his day, Peer doesn’t know how he was able to survive.
“Maybe children resist better, I don’t know.” He said in an interview last week.’ (1)
This – to even the most gullible of ‘Holocaust’ proponents – is patently ridiculous since Peer not only claims that he was ‘sent to the gas chamber at least six times’, but that he (and children in general apparently) have some kind of special resistance to Zyklon B and/or carbon monoxide which prevents them getting killed by it like everyone else apparently was.
Peer’s story becomes even more ludicrous when we realise that his story doesn’t even make any sense because:
‘In 1942, at age 9, Peer and his younger brother and sister were arrested by police in their homeland of France. His mother was sent to Auschwitz and never returned.
Peer and his siblings were sent to Bergen-Belsen two years later.’ (2)
So, Peer is claiming here that in 1942 – in the initial and in many ways the deadliest phase of the ‘Holocaust’ according to the orthodox historical narrative – that his mother, siblings and he were arrested by French police because they were jewish, but his mother was shipped off to Auschwitz where it is implied she was ‘gassed’, but Peer and his siblings – who were are told all survived by-the-way – were just left in limbo for two years in an unspecified location – which is contrary to the orthodox ‘Holocaust’ narrative since as children and thus ‘useless eaters’ they would have been priority targets for gassing – and in 1944 Peer was then shipped off to Bergen-Belsen.
The problem?
Well since Peer doesn’t say he was held in other camp than Bergen-Belsen – which didn’t have gas chambers according to the orthodox ‘Holocaust’ narrative – then one wonders where he was ‘sent to the gas chamber at least six times’ because it wasn’t Bergen-Belsen and the only way Peer’s narrative would make any sort of sense would be if he and his siblings were also sent to Auschwitz with their mother, inexplicably survived there for two years and were transported to Bergen-Belsen as the Auschwitz camp complex was evacuated and destroyed in late 1944.
Either way clearly Peer couldn’t have had a ‘greater resistance to gassing’ than others and wasn’t ‘sent to the gas chambers at least six times’, because such a claim is patently ludicrous.
One rather suspect Peer – like many a ‘Holocaust Survivor’ – is simply telling porkies to get attention and sell his autobiography.
References
(1) Karen Seidman, ‘Surviving the Horror’, The Gazette, 5th August 1993
(2) Ibid.
'Telling porkies', lol.