Hoax Confirmed: The Point Pleasant Punch Up (2024)
Yet another so-called ‘anti-Semitic hate crime’ has occurred.
This time it is in Point Pleasant Beach in New Jersey with local news outlet WOBM giving us the details:
‘A councilwoman in Ocean County is facing calls to resign from residents and the mayor in response to a video that appears to show her calling her neighbor a Jew.
Video from the Feb. 27 incident shows Rosa Crowley, the council president for Point Pleasant Beach, arguing with her neighbor who is Jewish.
It shows Crowley making a comment, to which her neighbor responded, "What'd you just say? Jew?"
A police report from the incident said that a police officer reviewed the footage. The officer concluded that Crowley had said the Spanish word for Jew, which is "judio."
The exchange was also reviewed by an assistant prosecutor with the Ocean County Prosecutor's Office. The OCPO Bias Crime Unit reviewed the footage and determined the incident was a bias incident "but did not rise to the level of a bias crime," according to the police report.
The Ocean County Prosecutor's Office did not respond to a request for comment.’ (1)
Reading the above it is clear that Rosa Crowley is being targeted by said jewish neighbour because Crowley got into a dispute with them of some kind. The claim that Crowley allegedly said ‘Jew’ not in English but in Spanish – i.e., ‘Judio’ – is farcical.
Why?
Crowley doesn’t appear to be Hispanic and given that she likely talks primarily in English even if fluent in Spanish – she is in New Jersey after all – then why on earth would she say ‘Jew’ in Spanish not English.
The fact that the ‘OCPO Bias Crime Unit’ ‘reviewed the footage’ and ‘determined the incident was a bias incident’ which is apparently based on the attending police officer’s report that they ‘reviewed the footage’ and stated that Crowley said ‘Judio’ seems solid until you realise that the jewish neighbour stated ‘What'd you just say? Jew?’ not ‘What'd you just say? Judio?’
Then we note a significant discrepancy in that the attending police officer thinks Crowley said ‘Judio’, the jewish neighbour claims she said ‘Jew’ and the ‘OCPO Bias Crime Unit’ doesn’t disclose what she thinks she said.
Basically the ‘OCPO Bias Crime Unit’ wants to justify its existence but not commit to one side of the story so it doesn’t go to court – hence ‘did not rise to the level of a bias crime’ – because the ‘OCPO Bias Crime Unit’ is well aware that any competent trial attorney would rip apart the Ocean County Prosecutor's Office’s ‘bias crime’ case simply by pointing out the contradictions in the stories of the jewish neighbour and the attending police officer’s report as well as the ‘OCPO Bias Crime Unit’s’ non-committal statement about what Crowley said.
They’d also likely point there are multiple other ‘non-anti-Semitic’ words that sound like ‘Jew’ or ‘Judio’ that Crowley could have used that could have been mistaken for ‘Jew’ or ‘Judio’ which would make more sense in the context of a dispute between neighbours such as ‘Judas’.
Also, why on earth is making a factual statement about someone – calling a jew… well… a jew… suddenly a ‘bias incident’ worthy of investigation as a potential ‘bias crime’?
Orwellian: much?
Regardless it is clear that the Crowley’s jewish neighbour is weaponizing the accusation of ‘anti-Semitism’ against Crowley and then using a ‘media war’ of innuendo and slander rather than the likely unsuccessful legal route to try win said dispute.
Thus I think in the absence of any other information we can treat the claims of the jewish neighbour against Rosa Crowley as yet another confirmed ‘anti-Semitic hate crime’ hoax.
References
(1) https://wobm.com/ixp/385/p/nj-councilwoman-denies-calling-her-neighbor-jew-point-pleasant-crowley/