Hoax Alert: Mugged Off in Manchester (2024)

I’ve recently written about the fraud being perpetrated by two Israeli brothers who claim they were subject to ‘anti-Semitic abuse’ at by UK Border Force at Manchester airport in the UK. (1)

However, this was prefigured by a similar jewish claim – also from the city of Manchester in the UK – of ‘official anti-Semitism’ regarding an alleged incident at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital. This hasn’t been given as much air time as the Israeli brothers’ self-serving ‘anti-Semitism’ hoax, but it is worth looking at as a good example of how jews operate.

The ‘Manchester Evening News’ writes that:

‘The Royal Manchester Children's Hospital has issued a statement amid claims a Jewish boy was mistreated. The accusations were made in a social post that alleges a young boy was removed by a nurse from a bay on a ward while wearing 'visibly Jewish' clothing.

"Due to that," the post reads, the boy 'had to lie on the floor' while being treated at one point. The post also alleges that the 'last few times' the boy has attended the hospital, he has been 'denied correct medical care'.

It also alleges that some staff are wearing 'free Palestine' badges and that the boy was 'scared'. "Coincidentally, today when not visibly Jewish, he received quick care," the post adds. "Also worth noting, prior to the conflict he received excellent care."’ (2)

Here we need to note the key phrases/terms of ‘visibly jewish’, ‘free Palestine badges’, ‘scared’, ‘had to lie on the floor’ and ‘denied correct medical care’ before we continue as these are key to claim.

Next, we are told by the same source how the claim emerged:

‘The post featured two images of a boy, with his face obscured by emojis, including one of him appearing to be sitting on a hospital bed and one of him appearing to be lying on a floor with a bandage on his arm. On Thursday spokesperson for Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust said: "We are aware of images and very serious claims which are circulating on social media.’ (3)

Further we are told who shared the images and the interpretative commentary that is being used by the jews in this story (the boy’s jewish uncle):

‘The post is understood to have been written by an uncle of the boy. The post being circulated on social media does not name the author of the post, with anonymised screenshots excluding the identity of the original poster being shared on other social media accounts, however the original post has been traced back to a social networking site.’ (4)

Next, we are given the interpretative matrix by the jewish uncle:

‘As a result of the alleged treatment, the poster claims 'my proudly Jewish nephew (and his parents) is scared to not get treatment if he wears' Jewish clothing.

The post adds: "What the actual f*** is going on? Is this the world we will live in? Is it 1940 again? It is terrifying to be a Jew in the world again."

"To be honest, I'm not sure what can be done," the poster adds.

"At the very least I firmly believe that public medical healthcare professionals shouldn't be wearing political pins that make people/children, scared/nervous/worry."’ (5)

Then we are given who are promoting this as an ‘anti-Semitic hate crime’ - it is our old friends from the Israeli brothers’ ‘anti-Semitic hate crime’ hoax; the ‘Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester’ – when the ‘Manchester Evening News’ writes that:

‘The Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester and Region, the representative body of the Greater Manchester Jewish community, asked children’s hospital chief executive Stephen Dickson and MFT chief executive Mark Cubbon to ‘investigate this as a matter of extreme urgency’. (6)

[…]

‘In a letter penned by the organisation’s own chief executive Marc Levy, alleged that 'a Jewish family have been targeted due to the conflict in the Middle East', adding that this is 'naturally hugely concerning'.’ (7)

[…]

‘“Allowing NHS staff to wear these badges means many Jewish people seeking treatment at the Royal Manchester Children’s Hospital and across the Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust will feel intimidated and unsure if they will receive equal and correct treatment. This is unacceptable.”’ (8)

Now breaking this down this word salad is actually pretty easy if we use the key phrases/terms I mentioned earlier.

In summary then: a ‘visibly jewish’ child was photographed ‘lying on the floor’ at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital and was alleged to have been ‘denied correct medical care’ by medical staff wearing ‘free Palestine badges’ and is now ‘scared’.

The problem with this narrative is really simple: all this comes from one very biased source; the child’s jewish uncle posting on social media.

There is no evidence that the child laying on the floor is related to his jewishness – for a personal example I had to sleep on a maternity ward’s waiting room floor of a British hospital once many years ago not because I was ‘being abused’ or ‘discriminated against’ but because there was no other place to sleep – and we have only the jewish uncle’s claims that the child being on the floor was not because of the child’s choice (for example it could be due to the child’s sensory needs) or because of a lack of available facilities for the child to sit elsewhere.

It isn’t like the child, or the floor is covered in filth or there is anything obviously wrong with the situation, so we are left having to either believe or disbelieve the jewish uncle because he’s making an accusation on no evidence but his own interpretation.

Further the jewish uncle is the one linking said alleged bad treatment to the presence of ‘Free Palestine’ badges bearing worn by the staff. There’s no link between the two and the way the jewish uncle gets around this obvious issue is by claiming the child was ‘visibly jewish’ but also that this could be ‘hidden’ (presumably he was wearing a kippah) so the ‘evil’ hospital staff ‘knew’ the child was jewish as a result.

There’s simply no evidence of such a link nor even of the behaviour, but that didn’t stop the ‘Jewish Representative Council of Greater Manchester’ immediately going on the offensive and shrieking that this was an act of ‘anti-Semitism’. When but a moment’s thought would have told them that they needed to check the story before they claim it as ‘anti-Semitism’.

Indeed, it is pretty clear that is almost certainly a made-up claim that weaponized the child’s situation to promote the idea of the jews being ‘systematically persecuted’ in Britain as well as also pave the way for potential legal action against the British National Health Service (NHS).

This is why you don’t #BelieveAllJews.

References

(1) See my article: https://karlradl14.substack.com/p/dissecting-the-alleged-anti-semitism

(2) https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/childrens-hospital-issues-statement-after-28874025

(3) Ibid.

(4) Ibid.

(5) Ibid.

(6) Ibid.

(7) Ibid.

(8) Ibid.