Jewish behaviour is often self-contradictory in large part because they themselves engage in Chutzpah without sufficient self-reflection to realise they are being contradictory in their own claims – i.e., when jews do it is justified, when non-jews do it is never justified – and once such example has raised its head recently in the Canadian city of Montreal.
Where we are told that:
‘Montreal police are investigating after electronic message boards at two road construction sites in Montreal displayed pro-Palestinian political slogans Wednesday morning instead of usual traffic alerts.
The message boards that normally advise motorists of roadwork were hacked to display phrases such as “free Palestine,” “escalate now,” and “globalize the intifada.” By the end of the morning, the original message had been restored at at least one of the sites.
Intifada, which means “shaking off” in Arabic, was coined to describe an uprising against Israel’s military occupation that erupted in 1987. What became known as the first intifada was marked by widespread Palestinian protests and a fierce Israeli response.
In the second uprising, which began in 2000, Palestinian militants carried out deadly suicide bombings on buses and at restaurants and hotels, eliciting crushing Israeli military reprisals.
Eta Yudin, Quebec vice-president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, called the messages on the traffic signs an incitement to violence against Jews because “intifada” refers to terror attacks.
Her organization wants police to investigate what happened and measures to be put in place so it does not happen again. She said “hijacking” signs that are meant to provide safety information to drivers with any kind of political message “raises huge alarm bells as to what these people are willing to do.”
A group called Clash Mtl claimed responsibility for the hack, writing on Instagram that it carried out the act during the night with the goal of showing “solidarity with Palestine.” The group did not respond to a request for comment.
A Montreal police spokesperson said by email that they are aware of the situation and are investigating. The city administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment.’ (1)
Now first let’s begin by noting the entire of the ‘anti-Semitism’ claim made by Eta Yudin of the ‘Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs’ is based upon the term ‘Intifada’ which she alleges is an ‘incitement to violence’ but the concept of ‘Intifada’ simply means ‘uprising’ and doesn’t necessarily carry any violent connotation (2) any more than Zionists advocating for settlements in Gaza has any necessary violent connotation.
It can do but that’s rather like saying that anyone who calls for strike action is ‘inciting violence’ because many strike actions have been (sometimes extremely) violent in the past rather than simply advocating strike action which in and of itself is a form of non-violent demonstration which can sometimes turn violent.
Thus, we can see that Yudin’s claims are a bit of… shall we say… a stretch to say the least.
Secondly jews have also conducted similar campaigns in the last few months – which are also arguably a hazard to motorists – such as having pro-Israel propaganda being shown on video screens on trucks driving around cities in the United States. (3)
If this is merely a legitimate political protest, then so is the similar but pro-Palestinian protest in Montreal.
Jews can’t have it both ways although they will always try to!
References
(1) https://chatnewstoday.ca/2024/07/24/montreal-electronic-traffic-signs-hacked-to-display-pro-palestinian-political-slogans/
(2) See: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intifada
(3) For example: https://www.foxnews.com/us/child-hostages-israel-center-mobile-ad-war-woke-campuses-across-america; https://www.wcia.com/news/local-news/traveling-truck-displaying-photos-of-jewish-hostages-make-stop-at-uiuc/