Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Justin's avatar

Great article. As I began reading it, the thought popped into my mind that most people suspend all reason, logic, critical thought, or requirement of proof whenever there is a pejorative or malicious accusation leveled against AH. Most attacks against him are typically accepted at face value as long as he is depicted in a negative light. The single testicle accusation specifically came to mind, and then a few sentences later there it was!

Expand full comment
William Beedie's avatar

What we all have to remember is that history is always written by the victors, and at times I feel AH is unfairly demonised, and this claim that he put a bounty out on an animal seems ludicrous to me as he was known to be such an animal lover he became vegan,

Questions to ask are what religion was the originator of this claim because it’s seems to me he/she was either Jewish or was a Zionist

Expand full comment

No posts