Blendr, Joel Simkhai and the Promotion of Homosexual Norms
In my article 'Grindr, Joel Simkhai and the Jews', I pointed out the little-known fact that the man most responsible for the promotion of homosexuality in the last fifty years is himself an Israeli homosexual: who openly promotes jewish 'suffering' and homosexual political causes to the captive audience that Grindr provides him.
Following on from the frightening and frankly disgusting success of Grindr among those sexual mutants who think it normal to fantasize about their own genitalia, excrement and ever younger boys (aka 'Twinks' in homosexual parlance). Simkhai sought to replicate the success of Grindr in the homosexual community by creating a new app along the same lines as it for the heterosexual community (aka those who are sexually normal). (1)
It is perhaps heartening to know that Blendr very much failed to do this since ladies in particular have shown little to no interest in such an app for the sake of no strings attached sex with men. (2) This has been put down to the fact that homosexuals are 'not able to publicly show their affection' while heterosexuals are. (3) That however is a complete utter nonsense is it assumes that given an equality of opportunity then all individuals regardless of sex while - in a phrase - take the opportunity to copulate like rabbits.
This can be easily demonstrated by thinking about how the sexes deal with their sexuality: women tend to be very reserved and careful about selecting a mate (the more reserved and careful usually correlates with higher intelligence, better means and being more attractive [i.e., they can afford to be picky]) whereas men are frequently not picky at all about selecting their mates. This is because men tend to look at mating as short-term affairs with little to no physical consequences other than immediate gratification and thus have no need to be emotionally attached: where-as women tend to look at mating as a long-term affair with significant risk and considerable physical consequences for them as individuals as well as for their families.
Thus, men will try to sleep with as many women as possible, but yet women will not tend to want to sleep with very many men and when they do want to mate with men: it is because they believe that in so doing, they are securing a long-term mate. As uncomfortable and politically incorrect as that may sound to many: it is nothing new to anyone who was read some of the considerable literature on the evolutionary biology and psychology of sex.
Hence it has nothing to do with being open or not about being able to 'flaunt one's sexuality' in bars or publicly on the streets.
What Simkhai tried to do in launching Blendr for heterosexuals is to mirror the success of Grindr yes, but what it reveals is something more fundamental: that Simkhai is using a fundamentally male conception of sex (i.e., it is something to be engaged in widely and with little to no emotional attachment) and applying it to women expecting them to behave like men, because that is what Simkhai himself understands.
It is ironic that male homosexuals - like Simkhai - are often regarded in the popular media as 'friends of women', but in reality, homosexuals are frequently misogynistic and apply their sexual appetites and ideas onto women. (4) This leads to the idea that women should really act like male homosexuals and in turn leads to the promotion of women behaving like men in having sex with anything that is male and moves.
This promotion of what has often been called in ages past harlotry is billed as a form of 'female empowerment', but yet all it actually does is try to force women into a mode of life that they are manifestly ill-suited to at a biological level (and which causes all sorts of problems like short-term relationships, mental instability, depression, single-mothers, suicide and quite probably lesbianism in part). This in turn leads to the assertions of third-wave feminism about 'men purchasing sexual rights to women' but that it is quite alright if 'women purchase sexual rights to women' (as that is 'female empowerment' rather than the 'possession of women for sex by the oppressive patriarchy').
It is this that Blendr tried to promote.
That it has categorically failed to do so was predictable, but it is also in itself revealing. In that jewish homosexuals - like Simkhai - who have a history of openly pushing a political agenda have in turn projected (and in so doing promoted) male attitudes towards sex onto (and to) women and essentially behaved in an openly misogynistic and condescending manner towards them in so doing by denying the very essence of what it is to be a woman: their femininity.
Indeed, they have sought to replace the femininity of women with the masculinity of men as that is what they as homosexuals are attracted to (or believe themselves to be so). In removing the femininity of women these homosexuals - of which the leaders like Simkhai are frequently jewish - seek knowingly or unknowingly to prevent children being born into homes which are stable and able to give them all the love and care that they need when growing up.
After all, according to Simkhai and his homosexual pals: it is all about the sex and there is no need for real relationships. You just need to undress, and love is sure to follow: that is what they understand by love. Sex: nothing more.
Is it any wonder that homosexuals generally make awful parents?
References
(1) http://www.good.is/posts/how-to-make-a-successful-hookup-app-for-heteros-cater-to-women
(2) http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/culture/2013/02/dating-app-for-women-that-isnt-awful.html
(3) http://www.good.is/posts/how-to-make-a-successful-hookup-app-for-heteros-cater-to-women
(4) http://www.vice.com/en_us/read/gay-men-and-their-not-so-cute-misogyny-problem